What Retirement Can You Actually Afford with $500k, $1 Million, or $2 Million in Assets?
Retiring on $500k was sort of possible in the 1990s. Doing it today would require $1 million or more, given 30 years of inflation and the muted market returns expected in the coming decades. If you want to retire on $1 million, be prepared to forgo most if not all luxuries, move to a low-cost country, and probably continue working part-time. However, there are several things you can do to improve your retirement standard of living.
Some writers talk about retiring on less than $1 million, but what does that look like, and what can you do to make it a retirement you’d actually enjoy?
Have you thought about retiring early?
Maybe in your 30s? 40s? 50s?
One couple, Billy and Akaisha Kaderli, did just that. They saved up $500k by the time they were 38 years old, in 1991, invested it, and called it a career.
Now, 30 years later, their portfolio is worth $1 million. Adjusting for inflation, that’s $514,201 in 1991 dollars. This means that after 30 years of living on about $30,000 a year funded by returns from their portfolio (plus income from part-time work blogging etc.), their inflation-adjusted portfolio value is about 2.8% higher than when they started (an annualized increase of 0.09%).
Not great, but not too shabby.
If you want to learn more about the Kaderlis’ journey, they answer the 20 questions they get asked most frequently here.
Let’s see what problems you have to overcome if you want to retire early, and what you can afford with $500k, $1 million, or $2 million in assets.
How to Know How Much You Should Have Already Set Aside:What the Millionaire Next Door’s “Wealth Equation” does well and where it’s less accurate
5 Problems with Early Retirement
The “holy grail” for adherents of FIRE, or Financial Independence Retire Early, is to amass as much money as possible, as quickly as possible. Although there are many FIRE “flavors,” for the most part you need to do two things.
First, live as frugally as possible so you can save and invest a very high percentage of your income. Second, plan to continue living a frugal lifestyle in retirement (e.g., the Kaderlis’ $30,000/year), which usually means moving someplace with a super-low cost of living and forgoing many things that most people aspire to or want in their lives (e.g., the Kaderlis went car-less many years ago, and in place of a large home they own a 1000-sqft “low maintenance, high amenity humble abode”).
This brings us to some problems with early retirement.
Length of Retirement
If you retire earlier, your nest egg has to last longer. According to the IRS, the life expectancy of a 38-year-old American is 45.6 years. By age 67, it drops to 19.4 years. This means that retiring at age 38, you must plan for an average of 26 years more in retirement than at age 67.
If your nest egg lasts exactly as long as your life expectancy, you have a 50/50 chance of outliving your money, because by definition half the people outlast their life expectance. If your parents lived into their 90s like mine, you should plan for more years in retirement.
Fewer Options in Case of Market Declines
If you’re still working and a bear market decimates your nest egg, you can keep working a few more years to cover your expenses, letting your portfolio recover once the market comes back. If you just retired and your portfolio suffers a 30% or bigger “shave,” your already tight budget may no longer be achievable.
According to Investopedia, there were 11 bear markets between 1956 and 2021. As shown in the table below, the S&P 500 dropped between 20% (the smallest decline that qualifies as a bear) and 56%. These bear markets were as brief as a single month, or as long as 31 months.
A nifty website called in2013dollars lets you see how the market performed over any stretch of time. The following screenshot shows how the market behaved from 1991 to 2021.
As you can see, the Kaderlis were very lucky in that the first bear market to hit after they retired was 8 years into their retirement, and with a 20% loss was barely enough to qualify as a bear at all.
At no point after their retirement did the S&P 500 fall below its 1991 level, and the average annual market return during their 30 years of retirement to date is higher than historic averages, at 10.73%.
Had they retired just before the 2020 bear, their $500k would have dropped to about $255k, and their plans would have crashed and burned with the market!
This is a perfect illustration of the so-called “sequence of returns risk.”
No Social Security at Retirement, and Much Lower Eventual Benefits
Since the earliest you can claim (greatly reduced) social security benefits is at age 62, retiring in your 30s, 40s, or 50s doesn’t allow you to count on those benefits to reduce your retirement funding gap.
According to CBPP, the average Social Security benefit in 2020 was about $18,170 a year. While this isn’t much, if you’re planning to live on $30,000, getting $18,170 reduces your nest egg requirement by over 60%!
Worse yet, if you retire early, your eventual benefit will be much lower. This because the Social Security Administration uses your 35 highest annual income numbers (from which you paid payroll taxes). If you started paying into the system at age 22 and retire at age 38, you’re giving up at least 54% of your eventual benefit.
Since most people’s earnings increase through their 30s, 40s, and 50s, the drop in your benefit will be even greater.
You Will Be Able to Retire if…How you can lop off more than a million dollars from your financial independence target
No Medicare at Retirement
If you retire in your 60s or later, most of your health insurance needs will be covered by Medicare. Retire in your 50s or earlier and you need to buy private health insurance for years or decades, or like the Kaderlis did at least part of the time, go “naked,” taking the risk that a major illness or accident may wipe you out financially.
If you plan to live on $30,000 a year, and something forces you to move back to the US (or other high-cost country), you’re almost certainly looking at a big problem. Either you cut your standard of living to the bone or worse, run out of money.
So, What Can You Afford on $500k, $1 Million, or $2 Million in Assets?
The common rule of thumb is the so-called “4% rule.”
Research conducted in the 1990s looked at historical returns and concluded that a balanced portfolio of stocks and bonds would have survived the worst 30-year period if you withdrew 4% in your first year in retirement, and then adjusted the dollar amount each year after that to account for inflation.
Based on this “rule,” $500k, $1 million, and $2 million would allow a first-year draw of $20k, $40k, and $80k, respectively.
However, current projections show a much more muted expected return from both stocks and bonds in the coming decades. This suggests a safer draw might be 3.5%, implying first-year draws of $17.5k, $35k, or $70k, respectively.
How to Figure Out What You Need to be Able to RetireYou may need a lot more (or less) than you thought to be able to retire — the venerable “4% rule” may not apply to you…
The Impact of Early Retirement
Since early retirement means you’d need to provide for a years- or decades-longer retirement, even 3.5% may be too optimistic. In that situation, you’d be well advised to reduce your initial draw to 3% or less, implying a maximum first-year draw of $15k, $30k, or $60k, respectively.
3 Things You Can Do to Improve Your Retirement Standard of Living
If we set aside the option of continuing to work and save for several more years or decades, what else can you do to be able to afford a more decent standard of living than a less-than-appealing $30k with a million dollars in assets?
First, you need to develop a budget that has more discretionary costs and less in fixed expenses. For example, if you have a $1750/month mortgage payment (or rent) to cover, that’s $21,000 a year that’s hard to reduce. Even a $1000/month housing cost would use up 40% of a $30k/year draw.
Add in a car loan payment, and paying for food and medicine may become impossible.
If you can do without a car and reduce your housing costs significantly, like the Kaderlis did, you have more wiggle room to cut discretionary expenses. That means that when (not if) the market drops, you don’t have to bite too deeply into your principal.
If most of your spending is discretionary, research shows you might be able to safely draw as much as 7% of your portfolio value in the first year of retirement. For the above portfolio sizes, that would be $35k, $70k, or as much as $140k, respectively!
Second, instead of seeing retirement as a time to sit on the couch and wait to die, see it as a time to pursue your life passions.
Working part time on things you love will fill your time with productive activities that give meaning to your life. It will also reduce the time you need to fill up with leisure activities that may cost money. Finally, it’ll provide some income to reduce the drawdown from your portfolio, or to enable you to live (somewhat) more expansively than a $30k/year budget would allow.
Third, research where you might be able to move such that:
- Cost of living is much lower for the quality and standard of living you want
- High-quality, affordable healthcare is available
- Personal safety is acceptably high
- You’d enjoy the climate
- You can (learn to) speak the language
- Visas and work permits (if needed) are available (and visitor visas are available for family and friends who may want to visit)
- Fun, low-cost activities are plentiful
- Communication with family and friends you leave behind is easy
- Healthy food is affordable
The Bottom Line
Retiring on $500k was possible in the 1990s, as proven by the Kaderlis. Doing the same today as they did then would require $1 million, if not more, given inflation over the past 30 years and the more muted market returns expected in the coming decades.
If you want to retire on even $1 million, you’ll likely be able to safely draw only $30k — $35k in your first year, adjusting for inflation each year from that dollar amount.
This means you’d best be prepared to forgo most if not all luxuries, move to a low-cost country, and probably continue working part-time doing something you enjoy for which others would be willing to pay you.
If you structure your life such that almost all your expenses are discretionary, you’ll be able to increase your year-one draw very significantly, perhaps to as much as 7%. For a $1 million portfolio, that’s $70k. For $2 million in assets, it’s a comfortable $140k.
About the Author
Opher Ganel has set up several successful small businesses, including a consulting practice supporting NASA and government contractors. His most recent venture is a financial strategy service for independent professionals. You can connect with him there, or by following his here and on this Medium publication, Financial Strategy.
This article is intended for informational purposes only, and should not be considered financial advice. You should consult a financial professional before making any major financial decisions.
Consultant | physicist | systems engineer | writer | financial strategist | avid reader | amateur photographer & artist | support my writing (and read much more financial insight) here ➜ https://opher-ganel.medium.com/membership