Can the Usage of Article Generators Nullify Content Writers?
Major AI Article Generators
Have you ever thought of a world where one doesn’t need to look up for cheap freelance writers to get their content written? A time where one doesn’t have to depend on the humanistic quality of “getting tired” and “not being able to write more than 3000 or 5000 words in a day?”
What if AI was designed to be such resources for us rather than humans – that would be an ideal solution, right? All those know-it-all Grammar Nazis and English Literature graduates will not have such a high pedestal to stand on, then, would they?
Congratulations, your prayers were heard quite a time ago now. Many major business empires have used AI article generators, for years now.
Major AI Article Generators
- Used by The Washington Post since 2016
- Was developed by the Washington Post itself to cover the 2016 Olympics in Rio
- It generated short reports of the Olympics to keep the readers updated. From medals to outcomes of various sports – it covered them all
- As per the publisher, it was created to give human writers time to work on essential and quality articles rather than replacing them
- The article generator created around 850 pieces in 2017 for the same publishing house and since then has been their own individual AI writer
- Won an award in the ‘Excellence in Use of Bots’ category at the ‘2018 GLOBAL BIGGIES AWARDS’
- The bot is not available to the public for usage, however.
- Created by Narrative Science
- As per the company, Quill is an “I. that automatically communicates relevant information at scale”
- Its most valuable of features or skill is that it can generate high quality, focused as well as insightful narratives with the help of any human or machine compiled information
- Kriss Hammond, the founder of Narrative Sciences, said that it could quickly adapt to a (sports) writer’s style and yet write 1000x more articles than the human writer himself
- The pricing for using this software is dependent on the types of stories one wants. One example can cost you $70,000 per annum producing around 100,000 stories or so.
- The Associated Press, one of the world’s largest news firms, uses Wordsmith by Automated Insights for their thousands of articles
- They started using it for financial reports. However, they moved on to using Wordsmith for college as well as minor league baseball coverage as well
- The software, although, requires a detailed set of instructions from humans to write the content in the correct tone and style
- The process is as follows;
- Raw Data -> Collected and; Compiled -> Humans create templates and samples for the software -> Wordsmith writes an article
- Wordsmith can generate a report in seconds that a human might take days to finish.
- You can request the company for a personal demo to see if it fits your business requirements. You can formulate a Digital Marketing Strategy using AI.
Cheap Article Generators:
Here is a list of cheap article generators online, in case you don’t have as much money to blow on the ones mentioned above. For these article generators, all you need is a good internet connection.
- Free Automatic Online Content Creation Tool
- Free Online Content Creation Tool
- Free Unique Content Generator Online
- SEO Article Generator | Content Maker | Post Generator Creator
- Online Article Generator Tool
- Free Article Content Creation Tool
- The Online Article Creation Tool
- Online Article Creator Tool
- Free Article Creator
- Article Generator Tool
Now you can fire those writers and shift to these AI writers to cut down the cost. Although all of this is having a software-obsessed tech industry that is self-sabotage.
Human writers versus AI writers
Now, since we know, the AI writers exist, and they might just take over the world while we are sitting across each other separated by a screen … let us consider as to why they can never be as good as a human writer.
i. Original Creativity
While AI writers or ‘robots’ can write 100x more stories than humans – they lack a sense of creativity. They follow a set of rules to write the ‘perfect’ piece of content and get on with the rest of their work. Even to write something creative, they would need a creative ‘human’ tweaking their algorithm with the slightest change in news.
One would need to change the set of rules a hundred times for 100 stories based on different genres. Writing about sports is easy if one is just giving out the highlights and scoreboard but a robot cannot write anything more than that – for now, at least.
Humans form their own opinions outside the lines of black and white. They understand the existence of a whole lot of grey matter – but can robots write like that? Do robots have their own opinions or do they need to be fed?
Humans 2 | Robots 0
iii. Emotional Triggers
Humanistic writing is full of emotional triggers to demand and grasp the attention of the readers. A piece of writing by an AI writer cannot have the same influence on the reader. Robots can make one feel sad, happy, or anything at all with their writing. A robot might feel something while reading a piece from an AI writer, but a human sure as hell can’t.
iv. Inexpensive yet touching
Yes, there are cheap article generators that exist for those who can’t opt for the expensive ones. In the world of AI, you get what you pay. Humans might work harder than their wages to prove themselves – robots have no such desire, however.
For instance, Julia McCoy, founder of Express Writers, gave Articoolo a try. Articoolo is a cheap AI writer that only cost $1.90 for an article. Here’s the first line of the article she got;
“Content promotion is a subject in the promotion universe relating to publishing important messaging to a specific audience. White papers will be an example of this.”
If you want such articles, sure – go ahead only to ruin your brand’s quality or invest a lot of money in the major AI writers to get what you want.
v. Relatable for the readers
Robotic writing is NOT relatable. It’s boring and too formal.
“The sundown was at 6:55 pm, and the moon was at its full crest that evening.”
“The sunset was a bit early for me that particular evening of March. However, the beauty of the moon subsided the gloominess I held within me.”
Which one do you like more? I wrote both, yes, but the first one is more formal and has no touch of emotions whatsoever. A robot might give you detailed versions, but it surely cannot be relatable for humans. The artificial intelligence for this is also a threat to cybersecurity.
The chances of having to work with robots as our co-workers exist, yes. However, the chances of robots nullifying us completely aren’t in at least 100 more years unless they learn the art of consciousness before that.
Robots are great as subordinates working on mundane tasks and detailed statistics but that’s about it. If humans didn’t like reading their fellow humans – novels would never have been a thing.